Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD A10-7890K
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 4.1 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher turbo speed of 5.0 GHz compared to AMD A10-7890K's 4.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has more cores (8) compared to AMD A10-7890K's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports more threads (16) compared to AMD A10-7890K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5 socket, while AMD A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched in Q2 2024, while AMD A10-7890K was launched in Q2 2016.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD A10-7890K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F and AMD A10-7890K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a base speed of 4.1 GHz, while the AMD A10-7890K runs at 4.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports a turbo speed of 5.0 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD A10-7890K.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 8 cores, while the AMD A10-7890K has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports 16 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-7890K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F uses the AM5, while the AMD A10-7890K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched on Q2 2024, while the AMD A10-7890K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-7890K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
AMD A10-7890K
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Turbo
5.0 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
8
4
Threads
16
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FM2+
Launched
Q2 2024
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F:
64%
AMD A10-7890K:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
45%
AMD A10-7890K:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD A10-7890K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F : Q2 2024 ✅
AMD A10-7890K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
AMD A10-7890K
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F was launched more recently (Q2 2024) compared to the AMD A10-7890K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.0 GHz compared to the AMD A10-7890K's 4.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3882, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms the AMD A10-7890K (score: 1579). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD A10-7890K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F has a higher CPU Mark score of 145.11 compared to the AMD A10-7890K's 26.02. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
AMD A10-7890K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A10-7890K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-7890K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A10-7890K scores 3542, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's score of 31198. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-7890K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700F's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-7890K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A10-7890K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700F is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-7890K
The AMD A10-7890K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
