Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Athlon X4 860K
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher turbo speed of 5.1 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4.0 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has more cores (8) compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports more threads (16) compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AM5 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched in Q3 2014.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and AMD Athlon X4 860K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a base speed of 4.2 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports a turbo speed of 5.1 GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 8 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports 16 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AM5, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
5.1 GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
8
4
Threads
16
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2024
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G:
65%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
46%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Athlon X4 860K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 860K : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.1 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4.0 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3944, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 860K (score: 1528). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Athlon X4 860K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher CPU Mark score of 247.57 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 124.68. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 860K scores 3431, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's score of 31792. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 65W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
