Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher base speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher turbo speed of 5.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has more cores (8) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports more threads (16) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AM5 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G was launched in Q1 2024, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a base speed of 4.2 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports a turbo speed of 5.1 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 8 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports 16 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G uses the AM5, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G was launched on Q1 2024, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Celeron G3900
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
4.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
5.1 GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
16
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM5
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q1 2024
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G:
65%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
46%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G : Q1 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Intel Celeron G3900
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G was launched more recently (Q1 2024) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher base clock speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 5.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3944, the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900 (score: 1690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 124.68. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G's score of 31792. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
The AMD Ryzen 7 8700G is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
