Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Intel Celeron J3060
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a higher turbo speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports more threads (16) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170 socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was launched in Q3 2017, while Intel Celeron J3060 was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3060's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 and Intel Celeron J3060 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J3060 runs at 1.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports a turbo speed of 3.7 GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 8 cores, while the Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports 16 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses the AM4, while the Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was launched on Q3 2017, while the Intel Celeron J3060 was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has 16 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J3060.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Intel Celeron J3060
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.0 GHz
1.6 GHz
Turbo
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
16
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
BGA1170
Launched
Q3 2017
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
16 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700:
33%
Intel Celeron J3060:
10%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
21%
Intel Celeron J3060:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Celeron J3060: 6 watts
1.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 : Q3 2017 ✅
Intel Celeron J3060 : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Intel Celeron J3060
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 was launched more recently (Q3 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron J3060 (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2029, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms the Intel Celeron J3060 (score: 635). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J3060 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3060 scores 678, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's score of 14717. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J3060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J3060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J3060
The Intel Celeron J3060 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
