Comparison between AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Intel Core i9-10900T
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i9-10900T is manufactured by Intel.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Core i9-10900T's 1.9 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 4.6 GHz.
Intel Core i9-10900T has more cores (10) compared to AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 8 cores.
Intel Core i9-10900T supports more threads (20) compared to AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 16 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i9-10900T uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 was launched in Q3 2022, while Intel Core i9-10900T was launched in Q2 2020.
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Core i9-10900T's 20 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Intel Core i9-10900T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the Intel Core i9-10900T runs at 1.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 supports a turbo speed of 4.6 GHz, compared to 4.6 GHz for the Intel Core i9-10900T.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i9-10900T has 10 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 supports 16 threads, compared to 20 threads for the Intel Core i9-10900T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i9-10900T uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 was launched on Q3 2022, while the Intel Core i9-10900T was released on Q2 2020.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to 20 MB for the Intel Core i9-10900T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Intel Core i9-10900T
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
3.4 GHz
1.9 GHz
Turbo
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Cores
8
10
Threads
16
20
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q3 2022
Q2 2020
L3 Cache
32 MB
20 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845:
57%
Intel Core i9-10900T:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
37%
Intel Core i9-10900T:
21%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Core i9-10900T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 : Q3 2022 ✅
Intel Core i9-10900T : Q2 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Intel Core i9-10900T
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 was launched more recently (Q3 2022) compared to the Intel Core i9-10900T (Q2 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Core i9-10900T's 1.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3442, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 outperforms the Intel Core i9-10900T (score: 2469). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Core i9-10900T's 20MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i9-10900T's 42.35. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 8 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900T's 10 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has 16 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i9-10900T's 20 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Core i9-10900T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i9-10900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i9-10900T scores 14822, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's score of 26043. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i9-10900T
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Intel Core i9-10900T
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i9-10900T
The Intel Core i9-10900T is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
