Comparison between AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and AMD FirePro A320 APU
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has more cores (12) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports more threads (24) compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2 socket.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD FirePro A320 APU was launched in Q3 2016.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a larger L3 cache of 64 MB compared to AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and AMD FirePro A320 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU runs at 3.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 12 cores, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports 24 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD FirePro A320 APU was released on Q3 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 64 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FirePro A320 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Turbo
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
12
4
Threads
24
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
FM2
Launched
Q3 2020
Q3 2016
L3 Cache
64 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT:
45%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
47%
AMD FirePro A320 APU:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT: 105 watts
26.25%
AMD FirePro A320 APU: 100 watts
25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD FirePro A320 APU : Q3 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU (Q3 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2746, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the AMD FirePro A320 APU (score: 1193). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT features a larger L3 cache of 64MB compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the AMD FirePro A320 APU's 100W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD FirePro A320 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 136.64. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FirePro A320 APU has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FirePro A320 APU scores 2153, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's score of 32658. This makes the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is a reliable and High End processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with High End computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FirePro A320 APU
The AMD FirePro A320 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
