Home » Compare » AMD-Ryzen-9-3900XT-vs-Intel-Core-i3-6098P

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Core i3-6098P

Overview:

Comparison between AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Intel Core i3-6098P

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Core i3-6098P is manufactured by Intel. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher base speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-6098P's 3.6 GHz. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher turbo speed of 4.7 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-6098P's GHz. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has more cores (12) compared to Intel Core i3-6098P's 2 cores. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports more threads (24) compared to Intel Core i3-6098P's 4 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4 socket, while Intel Core i3-6098P uses the LGA socket. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched in Q3 2020, while Intel Core i3-6098P was launched in Q1 2016. AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a larger L3 cache of 64 MB compared to Intel Core i3-6098P's 3 MB.

Specification Summary

The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Intel Core i3-6098P are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a base speed of 3.8 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-6098P runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a turbo speed of 4.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-6098P.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i3-6098P has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports 24 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-6098P.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4, while the Intel Core i3-6098P uses the LGA.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched on Q3 2020, while the Intel Core i3-6098P was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has 64 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-6098P.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs	AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT	Intel Core i3-6098P

Manufacturer	AMD	Intel
Speed	3.8 GHz	3.6 GHz
Turbo	4.7 GHz	GHz
Cores	12	2
Threads	24	4
Class	Desktop	Desktop
Socket	AM4	LGA
Launched	Q3 2020	Q1 2016
L3 Cache	64 MB	3 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:

CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT:

45%

Intel Core i3-6098P:

35%

* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:

CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

47%

Intel Core i3-6098P:

* More is Better

Power Efficiency:

Power Consumption of CPU under full load

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT: 105 watts

26.25%

Intel Core i3-6098P: 54 watts

13.5%

* Lower is Better

Launched Date:

Time when the CPU was launched

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT : Q3 2020 ✅

Intel Core i3-6098P : Q1 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Intel Core i3-6098P

Pro's and Con's

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher base clock speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P's 3.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.7 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2746, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the Intel Core i3-6098P (score: 2113). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT features a larger L3 cache of 64MB compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P's 3MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher CPU Mark score of 136.64 compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P's 40.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the Intel Core i3-6098P's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Core i3-6098P – Pros and Cons

Pros:

Not available

Cons:

Fewer Cores: The Intel Core i3-6098P has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Core i3-6098P has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Core i3-6098P scores 4017, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT's score of 32658. This makes the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Productivity

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Core i3-6098P
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Gaming

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.

Intel Core i3-6098P
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Verdict