Comparison between AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD FX-4320
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 3.4 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a higher turbo speed of 4.9 GHz compared to AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has more cores (16) compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports more threads (32) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses the AM4 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was launched in Q4 2020, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a larger L3 cache of 64 MB compared to AMD FX-4320's 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports a turbo speed of 4.9 GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has 16 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports 32 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X uses the AM4, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was launched on Q4 2020, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has 64 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.4 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
16
4
Threads
32
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
AM3+
Launched
Q4 2020
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
64 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X:
57%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
66%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X: 105 watts
26.25%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X : Q4 2020 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was launched more recently (Q4 2020) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.9 GHz compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4.2 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3469, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X features a larger L3 cache of 64MB compared to the AMD FX-4320's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a higher TDP of 105W compared to the AMD FX-4320's 95W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 132.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 16 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's 32 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD FX-4320 scores 3150, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X's score of 45590. This makes the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
This cpu Handles High End level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for High End level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ideal for High End level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and High End level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is a reliable and High End processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with High End computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
