Comparison between AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and AMD A12-9800E
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD A12-9800E's 3.1 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of 3.8 GHz.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has more cores (12) compared to AMD A12-9800E's 4 cores.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports more threads (24) compared to AMD A12-9800E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the sTR4 socket, while AMD A12-9800E uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched in Q3 2021, while AMD A12-9800E was launched in Q3 2017.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to AMD A12-9800E's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and AMD A12-9800E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD A12-9800E runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports a turbo speed of 3.8 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD A12-9800E.
Cores: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 12 cores, while the AMD A12-9800E has 4 cores.
Threads: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 supports 24 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A12-9800E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses the sTR4, while the AMD A12-9800E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched on Q3 2021, while the AMD A12-9800E was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 32 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A12-9800E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
AMD A12-9800E
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
12
4
Threads
24
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
sTR4
AM4
Launched
Q3 2021
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
32 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920:
38%
AMD A12-9800E:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
31%
AMD A12-9800E:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920: 140 watts
35%
AMD A12-9800E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 : Q3 2021 ✅
AMD A12-9800E : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
AMD A12-9800E
Pro's and Con's
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the AMD A12-9800E (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD A12-9800E's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2299, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms the AMD A12-9800E (score: 1617). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the AMD A12-9800E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A12-9800E's 5.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has a higher TDP of 140W compared to the AMD A12-9800E's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD A12-9800E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD A12-9800E has 4 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 12 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD A12-9800E has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 24 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A12-9800E scores 3471, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920's score of 22066. This makes the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A12-9800E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
AMD A12-9800E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A12-9800E
The AMD A12-9800E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
