Comparison between AMD Sempron 240 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Both CPUs are manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has more cores (6) compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to AMD Sempron 240's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4 socket.
AMD Sempron 240 was launched in Q4 2018, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was launched in Q3 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to AMD Sempron 240's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Sempron 240 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Sempron 240 has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Sempron 240 supports a turbo speed of 3.3 GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 supports threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched on Q4 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The AMD Sempron 240 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Sempron 240
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Manufacturer
AMD
AMD
Speed
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
AM4
Launched
Q4 2018
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240:
21%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240
1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600:
16%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Sempron 240: 65 watts
16.25%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Sempron 240 : Q4 2018 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Sempron 240
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Pro's and Con's
AMD Sempron 240 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 240 scores 1278, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600's score of 11240. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 3.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1884, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 outperforms the AMD Sempron 240 (score: 1300). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the AMD Sempron 240's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 35.39. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Sempron 240
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Sempron 240
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Sempron 240
The AMD Sempron 240 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
