Comparison between AMD Sempron 240 and Intel Pentium G3450
AMD Sempron 240 is manufactured by AMD, while Intel Pentium G3450 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Pentium G3450 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz.
AMD Sempron 240 has a higher turbo speed of 3.3 GHz compared to Intel Pentium G3450's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Pentium G3450 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Sempron 240's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2 socket, while Intel Pentium G3450 uses the FCLGA1150 socket.
AMD Sempron 240 was launched in Q4 2018, while Intel Pentium G3450 was launched in Q3 2014.
Intel Pentium G3450 has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to AMD Sempron 240's MB.
Specification Summary
The AMD Sempron 240 and Intel Pentium G3450 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by AMD.
Speed: The AMD Sempron 240 has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the Intel Pentium G3450 runs at 3.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The AMD Sempron 240 supports a turbo speed of 3.3 GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Pentium G3450.
Cores: The AMD Sempron 240 has 2 cores, while the Intel Pentium G3450 has 2 cores.
Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 supports threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Pentium G3450.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The AMD Sempron 240 uses the FM2, while the Intel Pentium G3450 uses the FCLGA1150.
Launch Date: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched on Q4 2018, while the Intel Pentium G3450 was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The AMD Sempron 240 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Pentium G3450.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
AMD Sempron 240
Intel Pentium G3450
Manufacturer
AMD
Intel
Speed
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Turbo
3.3 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FM2
FCLGA1150
Launched
Q4 2018
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240:
21%
Intel Pentium G3450:
31%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
AMD Sempron 240
1%
Intel Pentium G3450:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
AMD Sempron 240: 65 watts
16.25%
Intel Pentium G3450: 53 watts
13.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
AMD Sempron 240 : Q4 2018 ✅
Intel Pentium G3450 : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
AMD Sempron 240
Intel Pentium G3450
Pro's and Con's
AMD Sempron 240 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron 240 was launched more recently (Q4 2018) compared to the Intel Pentium G3450 (Q3 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Sempron 240 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.3 GHz compared to the Intel Pentium G3450's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Sempron 240 has a higher CPU Mark score of 35.39 compared to the Intel Pentium G3450's 18.92. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Sempron 240 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Pentium G3450's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron 240 scores 1278, which is lower than the Intel Pentium G3450's score of 2178. This makes the Intel Pentium G3450 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Sempron 240 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Pentium G3450's 53W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Pentium G3450 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Pentium G3450 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron 240's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1897, the Intel Pentium G3450 outperforms the AMD Sempron 240 (score: 1300). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Pentium G3450 features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the AMD Sempron 240's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
AMD Sempron 240
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Pentium G3450
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
AMD Sempron 240
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Pentium G3450
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
AMD Sempron 240
The AMD Sempron 240 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Pentium G3450
The Intel Pentium G3450 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
