Comparison between Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core and AMD Athlon 3000G
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core is manufactured by Apple, while AMD Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has more cores (20) compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core uses the socket, while AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket.
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Athlon 3000G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core and AMD Athlon 3000G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Apple.
Speed: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a base speed of GHz, while the AMD Athlon 3000G runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Cores: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has 20 cores, while the AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores.
Threads: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core uses the , while the AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD Athlon 3000G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
AMD Athlon 3000G
Manufacturer
Apple
AMD
Speed
GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
20
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
AM4
Launched
Q1 2022
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core:
64%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
59%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
6%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core: 60 watts
15%
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core : Q1 2022 ✅
AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
AMD Athlon 3000G
Pro's and Con's
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3869, the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core outperforms the AMD Athlon 3000G (score: 1979). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 49.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core has a higher TDP of 60W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Athlon 3000G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's 20 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 3000G scores 4477, which is lower than the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core's score of 41255. This makes the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
The Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon 3000G
The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
