Comparison between Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core and Intel Celeron N5095
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core is manufactured by Apple, while Intel Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher base speed of 2.0 GHz compared to Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's GHz.
Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's GHz.
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core has more cores (24) compared to Intel Celeron N5095's 4 cores.
Intel Celeron N5095 supports more threads (4) compared to Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core uses the socket, while Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338 socket.
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core was launched in Q2 2023, while Intel Celeron N5095 was launched in Q3 2021.
Intel Celeron N5095 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core and Intel Celeron N5095 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Apple.
Speed: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Celeron N5095 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.9 GHz for the Intel Celeron N5095.
Cores: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core has 24 cores, while the Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron N5095.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core uses the , while the Intel Celeron N5095 uses the FCBGA1338.
Launch Date: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core was launched on Q2 2023, while the Intel Celeron N5095 was released on Q3 2021.
L3 Cache: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Celeron N5095.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
Intel Celeron N5095
Manufacturer
Apple
Intel
Speed
GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.9 GHz
Cores
24
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1338
Launched
Q2 2023
Q3 2021
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core:
70%
Intel Celeron N5095:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
73%
Intel Celeron N5095:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core: watts
0%
Intel Celeron N5095: 15 watts
3.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core : Q2 2023 ✅
Intel Celeron N5095 : Q3 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
Intel Celeron N5095
Pro's and Con's
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4205, the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095 (score: 1502). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Celeron N5095 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron N5095 was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core (Q2 2023). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher base clock speed of 2.0 GHz compared to the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron N5095 has 4 cores, which is fewer than the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's 24 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron N5095 scores 4075, which is lower than the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's score of 50534. This makes the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron N5095 has a higher TDP of 15W compared to the Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron N5095
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron N5095
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core
The Apple M2 Ultra 24 Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron N5095
The Intel Celeron N5095 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
