Comparison between Apple M4 8 Core and Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
Apple M4 8 Core is manufactured by Apple, while Intel Pentium Gold G6400T is manufactured by Intel.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Apple M4 8 Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Apple M4 8 Core has more cores (8) compared to Intel Pentium Gold G6400T's 2 cores.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T supports more threads (4) compared to Apple M4 8 Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Apple M4 8 Core uses the socket, while Intel Pentium Gold G6400T uses the FCLGA1200 socket.
Apple M4 8 Core was launched in Q4 2024, while Intel Pentium Gold G6400T was launched in Q2 2021.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Apple M4 8 Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Apple M4 8 Core and Intel Pentium Gold G6400T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Apple.
Speed: The Apple M4 8 Core has a base speed of GHz, while the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T runs at 3.4 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Apple M4 8 Core supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T.
Cores: The Apple M4 8 Core has 8 cores, while the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Apple M4 8 Core supports threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Apple M4 8 Core uses the , while the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T uses the FCLGA1200.
Launch Date: The Apple M4 8 Core was launched on Q4 2024, while the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T was released on Q2 2021.
L3 Cache: The Apple M4 8 Core has MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Apple M4 8 Core
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
Manufacturer
Apple
Intel
Speed
GHz
3.4 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
8
2
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
Launched
Q4 2024
Q2 2021
L3 Cache
MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Apple M4 8 Core:
75%
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T:
35%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Apple M4 8 Core
30%
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Apple M4 8 Core: 22 watts
5.5%
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Apple M4 8 Core : Q4 2024 ✅
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T : Q2 2021 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Apple M4 8 Core
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
Pro's and Con's
Apple M4 8 Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Apple M4 8 Core was launched more recently (Q4 2024) compared to the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T (Q2 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 4520, the Apple M4 8 Core outperforms the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T (score: 2100). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Apple M4 8 Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T's 55.29. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Apple M4 8 Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Apple M4 8 Core's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Pentium Gold G6400T features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Apple M4 8 Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Apple M4 8 Core's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Pentium Gold G6400T scores 3538, which is lower than the Apple M4 8 Core's score of 20967. This makes the Apple M4 8 Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Pentium Gold G6400T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Apple M4 8 Core's 22W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Apple M4 8 Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Apple M4 8 Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Apple M4 8 Core
The Apple M4 8 Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Pentium Gold G6400T
The Intel Pentium Gold G6400T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
