Comparison between Intel 300 and AMD Athlon X4 860K
Intel 300 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 860K is manufactured by AMD.
Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher turbo speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel 300's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 860K has more cores (4) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores.
Intel 300 supports more threads (4) compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched in Q3 2014.
Intel 300 has a larger L3 cache of 0 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel 300 and AMD Athlon X4 860K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.0 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD Athlon X4 860K was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 860K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel 300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.0 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2024
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
0 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel 300:
53%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel 300
10%
AMD Athlon X4 860K:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel 300: 46 watts
11.5%
AMD Athlon X4 860K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 860K : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel 300
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Pro's and Con's
Intel 300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 860K (score: 1528). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel 300 features a larger L3 cache of 0MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 860K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 860K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
AMD Athlon X4 860K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 860K was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the Intel 300 (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 860K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel 300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher CPU Mark score of 247.57 compared to the Intel 300's 87.32. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel 300's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon X4 860K scores 3431, which is lower than the Intel 300's score of 7160. This makes the Intel 300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 860K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel 300's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel 300
The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 860K
The AMD Athlon X4 860K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
