Comparison between Intel 300 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Intel 300 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is manufactured by AMD.
Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 3.7 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel 300's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has more cores (4) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel 300's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4 socket.
Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was launched in Q4 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel 300's 0 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel 300 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was released on Q4 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel 300
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
AM4
Launched
Q1 2024
Q4 2019
L3 Cache
0 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel 300:
53%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel 300
10%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel 300: 46 watts
11.5%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G : Q4 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel 300
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Pro's and Con's
Intel 300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 3.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G (score: 2302). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel 300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel 300 scores 7160, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G's score of 9081. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel 300 (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel 300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel 300's 0MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel 300's 87.32. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel 300's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel 300
The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
