🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-300-vs-Intel-Celeron-G4900

Intel 300 vs Intel Celeron G4900

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel 300 and Intel Celeron G4900

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). Intel 300 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket. Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while Intel Celeron G4900 was launched in Q2 2018. Intel Celeron G4900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to Intel 300's 0 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel 300 and Intel Celeron G4900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G4900 runs at 3.1 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G4900.
  • Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G4900.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2.
  • Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the Intel Celeron G4900 was released on Q2 2018.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G4900.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel 300 Intel Celeron G4900
Intel Intel
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Speed 3.9 GHz 3.1 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 4 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1700 FCLGA1151-2
Launched Q1 2024 Q2 2018
L3 Cache 0 MB 2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel 300:



53%
Intel Celeron G4900:
30%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel 300



10%
Intel Celeron G4900:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel 300: 46 watts



11.5%
Intel Celeron G4900: 54 watts
13.5%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅

Intel Celeron G4900 : Q2 2018 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel 300



Intel Celeron G4900


Pro's and Con's

Intel 300 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the Intel Celeron G4900 (score: 1837). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel 300 has a higher CPU Mark score of 87.32 compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 35.07. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

Intel Celeron G4900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G4900 was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the Intel 300 (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the Intel 300's 0MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel 300's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4900 scores 2385, which is lower than the Intel 300's score of 7160. This makes the Intel 300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G4900 has a higher TDP of 54W compared to the Intel 300's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron G4900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron G4900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel 300

The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron G4900

The Intel Celeron G4900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.