Comparison between Intel 300 and Intel Celeron J4105
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4105 has a higher turbo speed of 2.5 GHz compared to Intel 300's GHz.
Intel Celeron J4105 has more cores (4) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores.
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket.
Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while Intel Celeron J4105 was launched in Q1 2018.
Intel 300 has a larger L3 cache of 0 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4105's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel 300 and Intel Celeron J4105 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4105 runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.5 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4105.
Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4105 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron J4105.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the Intel Celeron J4105 was released on Q1 2018.
L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4105.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel 300
Intel Celeron J4105
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.9 GHz
1.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.5 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q1 2024
Q1 2018
L3 Cache
0 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel 300:
53%
Intel Celeron J4105:
18%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel 300
10%
Intel Celeron J4105:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel 300: 46 watts
11.5%
Intel Celeron J4105: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅
Intel Celeron J4105 : Q1 2018 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel 300
Intel Celeron J4105
Pro's and Con's
Intel 300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel 300 was launched more recently (Q1 2024) compared to the Intel Celeron J4105 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4105 (score: 1091). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel 300 features a larger L3 cache of 0MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel 300 has a higher CPU Mark score of 87.32 compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 27.10. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4105's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel 300 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the Intel Celeron J4105's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J4105 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4105 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.5 GHz compared to the Intel 300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4105 scores 2900, which is lower than the Intel 300's score of 7160. This makes the Intel 300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J4105
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J4105
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel 300
The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J4105
The Intel Celeron J4105 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
