🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-300-vs-Intel-Celeron-N5095A

Intel 300 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel 300 and Intel Celeron N5095A

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel 300's GHz. Intel Celeron N5095A has more cores (4) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores. Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338 socket. Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while Intel Celeron N5095A was launched in Q1 2022. Intel Celeron N5095A has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel 300's 0 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel 300 and Intel Celeron N5095A are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Celeron N5095A runs at 2.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.9 GHz for the Intel Celeron N5095A.
  • Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron N5095A has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Celeron N5095A.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Celeron N5095A uses the FCBGA1338.
  • Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the Intel Celeron N5095A was released on Q1 2022.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the Intel Celeron N5095A.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel 300 Intel Celeron N5095A
Intel Intel
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Speed 3.9 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo GHz 2.9 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 4 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1700 FCBGA1338
Launched Q1 2024 Q1 2022
L3 Cache 0 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel 300:



53%
Intel Celeron N5095A:
25%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel 300



10%
Intel Celeron N5095A:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel 300: 46 watts



11.5%
Intel Celeron N5095A: 15 watts
3.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅

Intel Celeron N5095A : Q1 2022 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel 300



Intel Celeron N5095A


Pro's and Con's

Intel 300 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel 300 was launched more recently (Q1 2024) compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the Intel Celeron N5095A (score: 1513). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron N5095A's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel 300 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the Intel Celeron N5095A's 15W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

Intel Celeron N5095A – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron N5095A supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel 300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron N5095A features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel 300's 0MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron N5095A has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel 300's 87.32. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron N5095A scores 4110, which is lower than the Intel 300's score of 7160. This makes the Intel 300 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron N5095A
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron N5095A
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel 300

The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron N5095A

The Intel Celeron N5095A is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.