Comparison between Intel 300 and Intel Core i7-5820K
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel 300 has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Core i7-5820K's 3.3 GHz.
Intel Core i7-5820K has a higher turbo speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel 300's GHz.
Intel Core i7-5820K has more cores (6) compared to Intel 300's 2 cores.
Intel Core i7-5820K supports more threads (12) compared to Intel 300's 4 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700 socket, while Intel Core i7-5820K uses the LGA2011-v3 socket.
Intel 300 was launched in Q1 2024, while Intel Core i7-5820K was launched in Q3 2014.
Intel Core i7-5820K has a larger L3 cache of 15 MB compared to Intel 300's 0 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel 300 and Intel Core i7-5820K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel 300 has a base speed of 3.9 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-5820K runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel 300 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the Intel Core i7-5820K.
Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i7-5820K has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel 300 supports 4 threads, compared to 12 threads for the Intel Core i7-5820K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel 300 uses the FCLGA1700, while the Intel Core i7-5820K uses the LGA2011-v3.
Launch Date: The Intel 300 was launched on Q1 2024, while the Intel Core i7-5820K was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel 300 has 0 MB of L3 cache, compared to 15 MB for the Intel Core i7-5820K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel 300
Intel Core i7-5820K
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
4
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1700
LGA2011-v3
Launched
Q1 2024
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
0 MB
15 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel 300:
53%
Intel Core i7-5820K:
33%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel 300
10%
Intel Core i7-5820K:
14%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel 300: 46 watts
11.5%
Intel Core i7-5820K: 140 watts
35%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel 300 : Q1 2024 ✅
Intel Core i7-5820K : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel 300
Intel Core i7-5820K
Pro's and Con's
Intel 300 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel 300 has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Core i7-5820K's 3.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3235, the Intel 300 outperforms the Intel Core i7-5820K (score: 1992). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel 300 has a higher CPU Mark score of 87.32 compared to the Intel Core i7-5820K's 70.75. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel 300 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-5820K's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel 300 has 4 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i7-5820K's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel 300 scores 7160, which is lower than the Intel Core i7-5820K's score of 9835. This makes the Intel Core i7-5820K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i7-5820K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i7-5820K was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the Intel 300 (Q1 2024). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Core i7-5820K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel 300's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i7-5820K features a larger L3 cache of 15MB compared to the Intel 300's 0MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i7-5820K has a higher TDP of 140W compared to the Intel 300's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel 300
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i7-5820K
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel 300
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i7-5820K
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel 300
The Intel 300 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i7-5820K
The Intel Core i7-5820K is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
