Comparison between Intel Atom E3815 and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Intel Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's GHz.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1 cores.
Intel Atom E3815 supports more threads (1) compared to AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Atom E3815 was launched in Q2 2014, while AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched in Q4 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Atom E3815 and AMD FX-770K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Atom E3815 has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Atom E3815 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Cores: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Atom E3815 supports 1 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Atom E3815 was launched on Q2 2014, while the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Atom E3815 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Atom E3815
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
1
4
Threads
1
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1170
FM2+
Launched
Q2 2014
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Atom E3815:
4%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Atom E3815
0%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Atom E3815: 5 watts
1.25%
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Atom E3815 : Q2 2014 ✅
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Atom E3815
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Atom E3815 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3815 scores 184, which is lower than the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core's score of 3060. This makes the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the Intel Atom E3815 (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1468, the AMD FX-770K Quad-Core outperforms the Intel Atom E3815 (score: 266). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.36. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Atom E3815's 1 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 5W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Atom E3815
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Atom E3815
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Atom E3815
The Intel Atom E3815 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-770K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-770K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
