🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-Atom-E3825-vs-Intel-Celeron-1047UE

Intel Atom E3825 vs Intel Celeron 1047UE

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Atom E3825 and Intel Celeron 1047UE

Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel. Intel Celeron 1047UE has a higher base speed of 1.4 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3825's 1.3 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). Both CPUs support the same number of threads (2).

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170 socket, while Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023 socket. Intel Atom E3825 was launched in Q2 2014, while Intel Celeron 1047UE was launched in Q1 2014. Intel Celeron 1047UE has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to Intel Atom E3825's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Atom E3825 and Intel Celeron 1047UE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Atom E3825 has a base speed of 1.3 GHz, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE runs at 1.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Atom E3825 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
  • Cores: The Intel Atom E3825 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Atom E3825 supports 2 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE uses the FCBGA1023.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Atom E3825 was launched on Q2 2014, while the Intel Celeron 1047UE was released on Q1 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Atom E3825 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron 1047UE.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Atom E3825 Intel Celeron 1047UE
Intel Intel
Manufacturer Intel Intel
Speed 1.3 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCBGA1170 FCBGA1023
Launched Q2 2014 Q1 2014
L3 Cache MB 2 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Atom E3825:



5%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
8%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Atom E3825



0%
Intel Celeron 1047UE:
1%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Atom E3825: 6 watts



1.5%
Intel Celeron 1047UE: 17 watts
4.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Atom E3825 : Q2 2014 ✅

Intel Celeron 1047UE : Q1 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Atom E3825



Intel Celeron 1047UE


Pro's and Con's

Intel Atom E3825 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Atom E3825 was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron 1047UE (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3825 scores 378, which is lower than the Intel Celeron 1047UE's score of 748. This makes the Intel Celeron 1047UE a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

Intel Celeron 1047UE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has a higher base clock speed of 1.4 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3825's 1.3 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 526, the Intel Celeron 1047UE outperforms the Intel Atom E3825 (score: 309). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron 1047UE features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the Intel Atom E3825's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Atom E3825's 5.37. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron 1047UE has a higher TDP of 17W compared to the Intel Atom E3825's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Atom E3825
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Intel Celeron 1047UE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Atom E3825
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

Intel Celeron 1047UE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Atom E3825

The Intel Atom E3825 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

Intel Celeron 1047UE

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.