Intel Celeron G3900 vs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher base speed of 2.8 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket.
Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
Intel Celeron G3900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3900 was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM1
Launched
Q1 2016
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900
3%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher base clock speed of 2.8 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1690, the Intel Celeron G3900 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's score of 2250. This makes the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
