Comparison between Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon X4 870K
Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 870K is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher base speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher turbo speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 870K has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3900 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Athlon X4 870K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+ socket.
Both CPUs were launched in the same year: Q1 2016.
Intel Celeron G3900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 870K's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon X4 870K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 870K runs at 3.9 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.1 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 870K.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 870K has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 870K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Athlon X4 870K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3900 was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 870K was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 870K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.1 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2016
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
AMD Athlon X4 870K:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3900
3%
AMD Athlon X4 870K:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
AMD Athlon X4 870K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 870K : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3900
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1690, the Intel Celeron G3900 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 870K (score: 1558). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 870K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 870K's 99.70. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 870K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 870K's score of 3410. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 870K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 870K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher base clock speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 870K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 870K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 870K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 870K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 870K
The AMD Athlon X4 870K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
