🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Celeron G3900 vs AMD Athlon X4 880K

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon X4 880K

Intel Celeron G3900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 880K is manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. AMD Athlon X4 880K has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 cores. Intel Celeron G3900 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+ socket. Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016, while AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched in Q2 2016. Intel Celeron G3900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron G3900 and AMD Athlon X4 880K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a base speed of 2.8 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K runs at 4.0 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron G3900 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3900 was launched on Q1 2016, while the AMD Athlon X4 880K was released on Q2 2016.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 880K.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron G3900 AMD Athlon X4 880K
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 2.8 GHz 4.0 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 2
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1151 FM2+
Launched Q1 2016 Q2 2016
L3 Cache 2 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G3900:



28%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
27%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G3900



3%
AMD Athlon X4 880K:
5%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts



12.75%
AMD Athlon X4 880K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅

AMD Athlon X4 880K : Q2 2016 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron G3900



AMD Athlon X4 880K


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1690, the Intel Celeron G3900 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 880K (score: 1633). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 38.71. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 880K's score of 3663. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 880K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Athlon X4 880K – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon X4 880K was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 880K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 880K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon X4 880K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon X4 880K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron G3900

The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon X4 880K

The AMD Athlon X4 880K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.