Comparison between Intel Celeron G3920 and AMD A6-7400K APU
Intel Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A6-7400K APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz.
AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Celeron G3920 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A6-7400K APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD A6-7400K APU uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron G3920 was launched in Q2 2016, while AMD A6-7400K APU was launched in Q4 2014.
Intel Celeron G3920 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A6-7400K APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3920 and AMD A6-7400K APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3920 has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD A6-7400K APU runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3920 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD A6-7400K APU.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores, while the AMD A6-7400K APU has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3920 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A6-7400K APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD A6-7400K APU uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3920 was launched on Q2 2016, while the AMD A6-7400K APU was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A6-7400K APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3920
AMD A6-7400K APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM2+
Launched
Q2 2016
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3920:
29%
AMD A6-7400K APU:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3920
3%
AMD A6-7400K APU:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3920: 51 watts
12.75%
AMD A6-7400K APU: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3920 : Q2 2016 ✅
AMD A6-7400K APU : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3920
AMD A6-7400K APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1781, the Intel Celeron G3920 outperforms the AMD A6-7400K APU (score: 1442). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3920 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A6-7400K APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Not available
AMD A6-7400K APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A6-7400K APU was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron G3920 (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-7400K APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher CPU Mark score of 19.25 compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-7400K APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3920's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-7400K APU scores 1640, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G3920's score of 2358. This makes the Intel Celeron G3920 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A6-7400K APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A6-7400K APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3920
The Intel Celeron G3920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A6-7400K APU
The AMD A6-7400K APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
