Comparison between Intel Celeron G3920 and AMD FX-4320
Intel Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FX-4320 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher base speed of 4.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3920's GHz.
AMD FX-4320 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3920 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD FX-4320's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+ socket.
Intel Celeron G3920 was launched in Q2 2016, while AMD FX-4320 was launched in Q1 2016.
AMD FX-4320 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3920's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3920 and AMD FX-4320 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3920 has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD FX-4320 runs at 4.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3920 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD FX-4320.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-4320 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3920 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-4320.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3920 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD FX-4320 uses the AM3+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3920 was launched on Q2 2016, while the AMD FX-4320 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD FX-4320.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3920
AMD FX-4320
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.9 GHz
4.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
AM3+
Launched
Q2 2016
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3920:
29%
AMD FX-4320:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3920
3%
AMD FX-4320:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3920: 51 watts
12.75%
AMD FX-4320: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3920 : Q2 2016 ✅
AMD FX-4320 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3920
AMD FX-4320
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G3920 was launched more recently (Q2 2016) compared to the AMD FX-4320 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1781, the Intel Celeron G3920 outperforms the AMD FX-4320 (score: 1564). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3920 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-4320's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3920 scores 2358, which is lower than the AMD FX-4320's score of 3150. This makes the AMD FX-4320 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-4320 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher base clock speed of 4.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.9 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-4320 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD FX-4320 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 2.18. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-4320 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3920's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-4320 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G3920's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-4320
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-4320
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3920
The Intel Celeron G3920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-4320
The AMD FX-4320 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
