Comparison between Intel Celeron G3950 and AMD A10-7800 APU
Intel Celeron G3950 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-7800 APU is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-7800 APU has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3950's 3.0 GHz.
AMD A10-7800 APU has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3950's GHz.
AMD A10-7800 APU has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G3950's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G3950 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A10-7800 APU's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD A10-7800 APU uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron G3950 was launched in Q1 2017, while AMD A10-7800 APU was launched in Q2 2014.
Intel Celeron G3950 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A10-7800 APU's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G3950 and AMD A10-7800 APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G3950 has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD A10-7800 APU runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G3950 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD A10-7800 APU.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-7800 APU has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G3950 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-7800 APU.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G3950 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD A10-7800 APU uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G3950 was launched on Q1 2017, while the AMD A10-7800 APU was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-7800 APU.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G3950
AMD A10-7800 APU
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.9 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
FM2+
Launched
Q1 2017
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3950:
30%
AMD A10-7800 APU:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G3950
3%
AMD A10-7800 APU:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G3950: 51 watts
12.75%
AMD A10-7800 APU: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G3950 : Q1 2017 ✅
AMD A10-7800 APU : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G3950
AMD A10-7800 APU
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G3950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1851, the Intel Celeron G3950 outperforms the AMD A10-7800 APU (score: 1461). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G3950 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A10-7800 APU's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G3950 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-7800 APU's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3950 scores 2322, which is lower than the AMD A10-7800 APU's score of 3210. This makes the AMD A10-7800 APU a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD A10-7800 APU – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-7800 APU was launched more recently (Q2 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron G3950 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-7800 APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-7800 APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A10-7800 APU has a higher CPU Mark score of 107.05 compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's 16.24. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-7800 APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G3950's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-7800 APU has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G3950's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G3950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-7800 APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G3950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-7800 APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G3950
The Intel Celeron G3950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-7800 APU
The AMD A10-7800 APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
