Comparison between Intel Celeron G4900 and AMD A10-7890K
Intel Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-7890K is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-7890K has a higher base speed of 4.1 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz.
AMD A10-7890K has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4900's GHz.
AMD A10-7890K has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G4900 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A10-7890K's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD A10-7890K uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron G4900 was launched in Q2 2018, while AMD A10-7890K was launched in Q2 2016.
Intel Celeron G4900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD A10-7890K's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4900 and AMD A10-7890K are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4900 has a base speed of 3.1 GHz, while the AMD A10-7890K runs at 4.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD A10-7890K.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-7890K has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-7890K.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4900 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD A10-7890K uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4900 was launched on Q2 2018, while the AMD A10-7890K was released on Q2 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-7890K.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4900
AMD A10-7890K
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
FM2+
Launched
Q2 2018
Q2 2016
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4900:
30%
AMD A10-7890K:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4900
3%
AMD A10-7890K:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4900: 54 watts
13.5%
AMD A10-7890K: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4900 : Q2 2018 ✅
AMD A10-7890K : Q2 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4900
AMD A10-7890K
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G4900 was launched more recently (Q2 2018) compared to the AMD A10-7890K (Q2 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1837, the Intel Celeron G4900 outperforms the AMD A10-7890K (score: 1579). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD A10-7890K's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G4900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 35.07 compared to the AMD A10-7890K's 26.02. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-7890K's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4900 scores 2385, which is lower than the AMD A10-7890K's score of 3542. This makes the AMD A10-7890K a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD A10-7890K – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-7890K has a higher base clock speed of 4.1 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-7890K supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-7890K has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G4900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-7890K has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G4900's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-7890K
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-7890K
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4900
The Intel Celeron G4900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-7890K
The AMD A10-7890K is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
