🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Celeron G4900T vs AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron G4900T and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core

Intel Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD. Intel Celeron G4900T has a higher base speed of 2.9 GHz compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2 cores. AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4900T's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron G4900T uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1 socket. Intel Celeron G4900T was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2015. Intel Celeron G4900T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron G4900T and AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron G4900T has a base speed of 2.9 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core runs at 2.7 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4900T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has 4 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900T supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron G4900T uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core uses the FM1.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4900T was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was released on Q2 2015.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron G4900T AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 2.9 GHz 2.7 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1151-2 FM1
Launched Q1 2018 Q2 2015
L3 Cache 2 MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G4900T:



28%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
19%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G4900T



3%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core:
3%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron G4900T: 35 watts



8.75%
AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron G4900T : Q1 2018 ✅

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core : Q2 2015 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron G4900T



AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron G4900T – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G4900T has a higher base clock speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 2.7 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1737, the Intel Celeron G4900T outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core (score: 1163). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4900T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G4900T has a higher CPU Mark score of 37.35 compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 35.79. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4900T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4900T scores 2239, which is lower than the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core's score of 2250. This makes the AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4900T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Celeron G4900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron G4900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron G4900T

The Intel Celeron G4900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core

The AMD Athlon II X4 638 Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.