Comparison between Intel Celeron G4920 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.2 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher turbo speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4920's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron G4920's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron G4920's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4920 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron G4920 was launched in Q3 2018, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was launched in Q1 2017.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a larger L3 cache of 16 MB compared to Intel Celeron G4920's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4920 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4920 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 runs at 3.2 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4920 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4920 supports 2 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4920 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4920 was launched on Q3 2018, while the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to 16 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 1600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4920
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.6 GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
2
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
AM4
Launched
Q3 2018
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4920:
32%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
34%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4920
3%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600:
17%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4920: 54 watts
13.5%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4920 : Q3 2018 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4920
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G4920 was launched more recently (Q3 2018) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4920 scores 2500, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 1600's score of 12278. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2066, the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the Intel Celeron G4920 (score: 1960). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 features a larger L3 cache of 16MB compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher CPU Mark score of 204.67 compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's 27.81. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4920
The Intel Celeron G4920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600
The AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
