Comparison between Intel Celeron G4920 and Intel Core i3-4160T
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G4920 has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Core i3-4160T supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4920's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4920 uses the FCLGA1151-2 socket, while Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150 socket.
Intel Celeron G4920 was launched in Q3 2018, while Intel Core i3-4160T was launched in Q4 2014.
Intel Core i3-4160T has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to Intel Celeron G4920's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4920 and Intel Core i3-4160T are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4920 has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4160T runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4920 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4160T.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4160T has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4920 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4160T.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4920 uses the FCLGA1151-2, while the Intel Core i3-4160T uses the LGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4920 was launched on Q3 2018, while the Intel Core i3-4160T was released on Q4 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-4160T.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4920
Intel Core i3-4160T
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151-2
LGA1150
Launched
Q3 2018
Q4 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4920:
32%
Intel Core i3-4160T:
29%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4920
3%
Intel Core i3-4160T:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4920: 54 watts
13.5%
Intel Core i3-4160T: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4920 : Q3 2018 ✅
Intel Core i3-4160T : Q4 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4920
Intel Core i3-4160T
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G4920 has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1960, the Intel Celeron G4920 outperforms the Intel Core i3-4160T (score: 1751). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4920 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4160T's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4920 scores 2500, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-4160T's score of 3113. This makes the Intel Core i3-4160T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G4920 has a higher TDP of 54W compared to the Intel Core i3-4160T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Core i3-4160T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4160T was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron G4920 (Q3 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4160T features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Core i3-4160T has a higher CPU Mark score of 51.89 compared to the Intel Celeron G4920's 27.81. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Not available
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-4160T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-4160T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4920
The Intel Celeron G4920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-4160T
The Intel Core i3-4160T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
