Comparison between Intel Celeron G4930T and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Intel Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G4930T's 3.0 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has more cores (6) compared to Intel Celeron G4930T's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 supports more threads (12) compared to Intel Celeron G4930T's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4930T uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron G4930T was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was launched in Q3 2019.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Celeron G4930T's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4930T and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4930T has a base speed of 3.0 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4930T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4930T has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has 6 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4930T supports 2 threads, compared to 12 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4930T uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4930T was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4930T has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4930T
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.0 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
6
Threads
2
12
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
AM4
Launched
Q3 2020
Q3 2019
L3 Cache
2 MB
32 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4930T:
29%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
41%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4930T
3%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600:
25%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4930T: 35 watts
8.75%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4930T : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 : Q3 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4930T
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4930T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G4930T was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 (Q3 2019). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4930T has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 6 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4930T has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's 12 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G4930T scores 2297, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600's score of 17402. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G4930T's 3.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2495, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 outperforms the Intel Celeron G4930T (score: 1769). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Celeron G4930T's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G4930T's 54.68. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G4930T's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4930T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4930T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4930T
The Intel Celeron G4930T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.