Comparison between Intel Celeron G4950 and AMD Athlon II X4 655
Intel Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.3 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
AMD Athlon II X4 655 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4950's 2 cores.
AMD Athlon II X4 655 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G4950's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G4950 uses the FCLGA1151 socket, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron G4950 was launched in Q1 2021, while AMD Athlon II X4 655 was launched in Q1 2014.
Intel Celeron G4950 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G4950 and AMD Athlon II X4 655 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G4950 has a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 runs at 3.3 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G4950 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G4950 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G4950 uses the FCLGA1151, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 uses the AM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G4950 was launched on Q1 2021, while the AMD Athlon II X4 655 was released on Q1 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon II X4 655.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G4950
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1151
AM2+
Launched
Q1 2021
Q1 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4950:
34%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G4950
3%
AMD Athlon II X4 655:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G4950: 54 watts
13.5%
AMD Athlon II X4 655: 95 watts
23.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G4950 : Q1 2021 ✅
AMD Athlon II X4 655 : Q1 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G4950
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G4950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G4950 was launched more recently (Q1 2021) compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (Q1 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2041, the Intel Celeron G4950 outperforms the AMD Athlon II X4 655 (score: 1473). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G4950 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon II X4 655's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G4950 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon II X4 655's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
AMD Athlon II X4 655 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G4950's 43.00. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon II X4 655 scores 2078, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G4950's score of 2714. This makes the Intel Celeron G4950 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon II X4 655 has a higher TDP of 95W compared to the Intel Celeron G4950's 54W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G4950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G4950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G4950
The Intel Celeron G4950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon II X4 655
The AMD Athlon II X4 655 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
