Comparison between Intel Celeron G5900 and AMD Athlon X4 840
Intel Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 840 is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Celeron G5900 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G5900's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 840 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G5900's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G5900 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G5900 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+ socket.
Intel Celeron G5900 was launched in Q2 2020, while AMD Athlon X4 840 was launched in Q1 2015.
Intel Celeron G5900 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 840's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G5900 and AMD Athlon X4 840 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G5900 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 runs at 3.1 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G5900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G5900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G5900 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G5900 uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 uses the FM2+.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G5900 was launched on Q2 2020, while the AMD Athlon X4 840 was released on Q1 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5900 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 840.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G5900
AMD Athlon X4 840
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
FM2+
Launched
Q2 2020
Q1 2015
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5900:
35%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
24%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5900
3%
AMD Athlon X4 840:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G5900: 58 watts
14.5%
AMD Athlon X4 840: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G5900 : Q2 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 840 : Q1 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G5900
AMD Athlon X4 840
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G5900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G5900 was launched more recently (Q2 2020) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840 (Q1 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G5900 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 3.1 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2111, the Intel Celeron G5900 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 840 (score: 1488). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5900 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G5900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 83.26 compared to the AMD Athlon X4 840's 26.55. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G5900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 840's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G5900 scores 2656, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 840's score of 3318. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 840 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 840 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 840 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G5900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G5900's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 840 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G5900's 58W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G5900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 840
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G5900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 840
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G5900
The Intel Celeron G5900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 840
The AMD Athlon X4 840 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
