Comparison between Intel Celeron G5900T and Intel Atom E3815
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G5900T has a higher base speed of 3.2 GHz compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Intel Celeron G5900T has more cores (2) compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1 cores.
Intel Celeron G5900T supports more threads (2) compared to Intel Atom E3815's 1 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G5900T uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket.
Intel Celeron G5900T was launched in Q4 2021, while Intel Atom E3815 was launched in Q2 2014.
Intel Celeron G5900T has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to Intel Atom E3815's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G5900T and Intel Atom E3815 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G5900T has a base speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Intel Atom E3815 runs at 1.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G5900T supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Atom E3815.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G5900T has 2 cores, while the Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G5900T supports 2 threads, compared to 1 threads for the Intel Atom E3815.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G5900T uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G5900T was launched on Q4 2021, while the Intel Atom E3815 was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5900T has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Atom E3815.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G5900T
Intel Atom E3815
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.2 GHz
1.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
1
Threads
2
1
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
FCBGA1170
Launched
Q4 2021
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5900T:
27%
Intel Atom E3815:
4%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5900T
3%
Intel Atom E3815:
0%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G5900T: 35 watts
8.75%
Intel Atom E3815: 5 watts
1.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G5900T : Q4 2021 ✅
Intel Atom E3815 : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G5900T
Intel Atom E3815
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G5900T – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G5900T was launched more recently (Q4 2021) compared to the Intel Atom E3815 (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G5900T has a higher base clock speed of 3.2 GHz compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1640, the Intel Celeron G5900T outperforms the Intel Atom E3815 (score: 266). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5900T features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the Intel Atom E3815's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G5900T has a higher CPU Mark score of 51.30 compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 1.36. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G5900T has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Atom E3815's 5W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Atom E3815 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G5900T's 2 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Atom E3815 has 1 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G5900T's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Atom E3815 scores 184, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G5900T's score of 2155. This makes the Intel Celeron G5900T a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G5900T
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Atom E3815
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G5900T
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Atom E3815
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G5900T
The Intel Celeron G5900T is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Atom E3815
The Intel Atom E3815 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
