Comparison between Intel Celeron G5920 and AMD Athlon X4 950
Intel Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon X4 950 is manufactured by AMD.
Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.5 GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G5920's GHz.
AMD Athlon X4 950 has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G5920's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron G5920 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G5920 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron G5920 was launched in Q4 2020, while AMD Athlon X4 950 was launched in Q3 2017.
Intel Celeron G5920 has a larger L3 cache of 2 MB compared to AMD Athlon X4 950's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G5920 and AMD Athlon X4 950 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G5920 has a base speed of 3.5 GHz, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G5920 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G5920 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G5920 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G5920 uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G5920 was launched on Q4 2020, while the AMD Athlon X4 950 was released on Q3 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5920 has 2 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Athlon X4 950.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G5920
AMD Athlon X4 950
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
AM4
Launched
Q4 2020
Q3 2017
L3 Cache
2 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5920:
35%
AMD Athlon X4 950:
27%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5920
3%
AMD Athlon X4 950:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G5920: 58 watts
14.5%
AMD Athlon X4 950: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G5920 : Q4 2020 ✅
AMD Athlon X4 950 : Q3 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G5920
AMD Athlon X4 950
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G5920 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G5920 was launched more recently (Q4 2020) compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950 (Q3 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2123, the Intel Celeron G5920 outperforms the AMD Athlon X4 950 (score: 1636). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5920 features a larger L3 cache of 2MB compared to the AMD Athlon X4 950's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G5920 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon X4 950's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G5920 scores 2577, which is lower than the AMD Athlon X4 950's score of 3591. This makes the AMD Athlon X4 950 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Athlon X4 950 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Athlon X4 950 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G5920's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher CPU Mark score of 122.72 compared to the Intel Celeron G5920's 32.22. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron G5920's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Athlon X4 950 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G5920's 58W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G5920
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Athlon X4 950
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G5920
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Athlon X4 950
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G5920
The Intel Celeron G5920 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Athlon X4 950
The AMD Athlon X4 950 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
