🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-Celeron-G5925-vs-AMD-Athlon-3000G

Intel Celeron G5925 vs AMD Athlon 3000G

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 3000G

Intel Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon 3000G is manufactured by AMD. Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). AMD Athlon 3000G supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G5925's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron G5925 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4 socket. Intel Celeron G5925 was launched in Q2 2021, while AMD Athlon 3000G was launched in Q4 2019. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron G5925 and AMD Athlon 3000G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the AMD Athlon 3000G runs at 3.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G5925 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron G5925 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon 3000G has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron G5925 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 3000G.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron G5925 uses the FCLGA1200, while the AMD Athlon 3000G uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G5925 was launched on Q2 2021, while the AMD Athlon 3000G was released on Q4 2019.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5925 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon 3000G.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron G5925 AMD Athlon 3000G
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 3.6 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCLGA1200 AM4
Launched Q2 2021 Q4 2019
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G5925:



37%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
32%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G5925



4%
AMD Athlon 3000G:
6%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron G5925: 58 watts



14.5%
AMD Athlon 3000G: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron G5925 : Q2 2021 ✅

AMD Athlon 3000G : Q4 2019 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron G5925



AMD Athlon 3000G


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron G5925 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 3.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2227, the Intel Celeron G5925 outperforms the AMD Athlon 3000G (score: 1979). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G5925 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 3000G's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G5925 scores 2787, which is lower than the AMD Athlon 3000G's score of 4477. This makes the AMD Athlon 3000G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher TDP of 58W compared to the AMD Athlon 3000G's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

AMD Athlon 3000G – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 3000G was launched more recently (Q4 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron G5925 (Q2 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon 3000G has a higher CPU Mark score of 49.74 compared to the Intel Celeron G5925's 30.95. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available


Productivity


Intel Celeron G5925
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon 3000G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron G5925
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon 3000G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron G5925

The Intel Celeron G5925 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon 3000G

The AMD Athlon 3000G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.