Comparison between Intel Celeron G5925 and Intel Celeron G3900
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (2).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G5925 uses the FCLGA1200 socket, while Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151 socket.
Intel Celeron G5925 was launched in Q2 2021, while Intel Celeron G3900 was launched in Q1 2016.
Intel Celeron G5925 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron G3900's 2 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G5925 and Intel Celeron G3900 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Intel Celeron G3900 runs at 2.8 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G5925 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G5925 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron G3900 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G5925 supports 2 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G5925 uses the FCLGA1200, while the Intel Celeron G3900 uses the FCLGA1151.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G5925 was launched on Q2 2021, while the Intel Celeron G3900 was released on Q1 2016.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5925 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 2 MB for the Intel Celeron G3900.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G5925
Intel Celeron G3900
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCLGA1200
FCLGA1151
Launched
Q2 2021
Q1 2016
L3 Cache
4 MB
2 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5925:
37%
Intel Celeron G3900:
28%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G5925
4%
Intel Celeron G3900:
3%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G5925: 58 watts
14.5%
Intel Celeron G3900: 51 watts
12.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G5925 : Q2 2021 ✅
Intel Celeron G3900 : Q1 2016 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G5925
Intel Celeron G3900
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G5925 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G5925 was launched more recently (Q2 2021) compared to the Intel Celeron G3900 (Q1 2016). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2.8 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2227, the Intel Celeron G5925 outperforms the Intel Celeron G3900 (score: 1690). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G5925 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 2MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G5925 has a higher TDP of 58W compared to the Intel Celeron G3900's 51W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron G3900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G3900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 134.42 compared to the Intel Celeron G5925's 30.95. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G3900 scores 2148, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G5925's score of 2787. This makes the Intel Celeron G5925 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G5925
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron G3900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G5925
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron G3900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G5925
The Intel Celeron G5925 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron G3900
The Intel Celeron G3900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
