🚀 CPU Launch

Home » Compare » Intel-Celeron-G6900-vs-AMD-Athlon-320GE

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Athlon 320GE

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Athlon 320GE

Intel Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Athlon 320GE is manufactured by AMD. AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz. Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz. Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2). AMD Athlon 320GE supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket, while AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4 socket. Intel Celeron G6900 was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD Athlon 320GE was launched in Q3 2021. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Athlon 320GE are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD Athlon 320GE runs at 3.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Athlon 320GE.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Athlon 320GE has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Athlon 320GE.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700, while the AMD Athlon 320GE uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD Athlon 320GE was released on Q3 2021.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Athlon 320GE.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron G6900 AMD Athlon 320GE
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 3.4 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo GHz GHz
Cores 2 2
Threads 2 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket LGA1700,BGA1700 AM4
Launched Q1 2022 Q3 2021
L3 Cache 4 MB 4 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G6900:



45%
AMD Athlon 320GE:
32%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G6900



6%
AMD Athlon 320GE:
6%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts



11.5%
AMD Athlon 320GE: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅

AMD Athlon 320GE : Q3 2021 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron G6900



AMD Athlon 320GE


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2727, the Intel Celeron G6900 outperforms the AMD Athlon 320GE (score: 1929). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Athlon 320GE's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the AMD Athlon 320GE's 35W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.

AMD Athlon 320GE – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD Athlon 320GE was launched more recently (Q3 2021) compared to the Intel Celeron G6900 (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Athlon 320GE has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 101.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Athlon 320GE scores 4399, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G6900's score of 4551. This makes the Intel Celeron G6900 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.


Productivity


Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Athlon 320GE
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Athlon 320GE
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron G6900

The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Athlon 320GE

The AMD Athlon 320GE is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.