Comparison between Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher turbo speed of 4.2 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's GHz.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 cores.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G supports more threads (8) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket, while AMD Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron G6900 was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was launched in Q3 2019.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of 4 MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Ryzen 5 3400G are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.2 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports 2 threads, compared to 8 threads for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was released on Q3 2019.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 4 MB for the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G6900
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
GHz
4.2 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
8
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
LGA1700,BGA1700
AM4
Launched
Q1 2022
Q3 2019
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900:
45%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G:
38%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900
6%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G:
13%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts
11.5%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G : Q3 2019 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G6900
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2727, the Intel Celeron G6900 outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G (score: 2329). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher CPU Mark score of 101.15 compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 66.74. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's 8 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G6900 scores 4551, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G's score of 9244. This makes the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G was launched more recently (Q3 2019) compared to the Intel Celeron G6900 (Q1 2022). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 3.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.2 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G6900
The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
The AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
