🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Ryzen 7 5800

Intel Celeron G6900 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. Both CPUs have the same base speed of 3.4 GHz. AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has a higher turbo speed of 4.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has more cores (8) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 cores. AMD Ryzen 7 5800 supports more threads (16) compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 2 threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AM4 socket. Intel Celeron G6900 was launched in Q1 2022, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 was launched in Q1 2021. AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has a larger L3 cache of 32 MB compared to Intel Celeron G6900's 4 MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron G6900 and AMD Ryzen 7 5800 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 runs at 3.4 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 4.6 GHz for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has 8 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports 2 threads, compared to 16 threads for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AM4.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched on Q1 2022, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 was released on Q1 2021.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to 32 MB for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron G6900 AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 3.4 GHz 3.4 GHz
Turbo GHz 4.6 GHz
Cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket LGA1700,BGA1700 AM4
Launched Q1 2022 Q1 2021
L3 Cache 4 MB 32 MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G6900:



45%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800:
56%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron G6900



6%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800:
37%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts



11.5%
AMD Ryzen 7 5800: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅

AMD Ryzen 7 5800 : Q1 2021 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron G6900



AMD Ryzen 7 5800


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched more recently (Q1 2022) compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (Q1 2021). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800's 8 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800's 16 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron G6900 scores 4551, which is lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800's score of 25735. This makes the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800 – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 3388, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms the Intel Celeron G6900 (score: 2727). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
  • Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 features a larger L3 cache of 32MB compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 4MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 101.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 46W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800
This cpu Handles Mid Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Mid Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800
Ideal for Mid Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Mid Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron G6900

The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 is a reliable and Mid Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Mid Level computing needs or those building a New PC.