Comparison between Intel Celeron G6900 and Intel Celeron J4025
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher base speed of 3.4 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher turbo speed of 2.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron G6900's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (2).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700 socket, while Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket.
Intel Celeron G6900 was launched in Q1 2022, while Intel Celeron J4025 was launched in Q1 2020.
Intel Celeron G6900 has a larger L3 cache of 4 MB compared to Intel Celeron J4025's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron G6900 and Intel Celeron J4025 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a base speed of 3.4 GHz, while the Intel Celeron J4025 runs at 2.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to 2.9 GHz for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Cores: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 2 cores, while the Intel Celeron J4025 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron G6900 supports 2 threads, compared to 2 threads for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron G6900 uses the LGA1700,BGA1700, while the Intel Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched on Q1 2022, while the Intel Celeron J4025 was released on Q1 2020.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900 has 4 MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the Intel Celeron J4025.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron G6900
Intel Celeron J4025
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
3.4 GHz
2.0 GHz
Turbo
GHz
2.9 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
LGA1700,BGA1700
FCBGA1090
Launched
Q1 2022
Q1 2020
L3 Cache
4 MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900:
45%
Intel Celeron J4025:
19%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron G6900
6%
Intel Celeron J4025:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron G6900: 46 watts
11.5%
Intel Celeron J4025: 10 watts
2.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron G6900 : Q1 2022 ✅
Intel Celeron J4025 : Q1 2020 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron G6900
Intel Celeron J4025
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron G6900 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron G6900 was launched more recently (Q1 2022) compared to the Intel Celeron J4025 (Q1 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher base clock speed of 3.4 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 2727, the Intel Celeron G6900 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4025 (score: 1147). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron G6900 features a larger L3 cache of 4MB compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron G6900 has a higher TDP of 46W compared to the Intel Celeron J4025's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Intel Celeron J4025 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4025 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J4025 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron G6900's 101.15. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4025 scores 1477, which is lower than the Intel Celeron G6900's score of 4551. This makes the Intel Celeron G6900 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron G6900
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Celeron J4025
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron G6900
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Celeron J4025
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron G6900
The Intel Celeron G6900 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Celeron J4025
The Intel Celeron J4025 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
