Comparison between Intel Celeron J1750 and Intel Core i3-4160
Both CPUs are manufactured by Intel.
Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher base speed of 3.6 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J1750's 2.4 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same turbo speed of GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Core i3-4160 supports more threads (4) compared to Intel Celeron J1750's 2 threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket, while Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150 socket.
Intel Celeron J1750 was launched in Q2 2014, while Intel Core i3-4160 was launched in Q3 2014.
Intel Core i3-4160 has a larger L3 cache of 3 MB compared to Intel Celeron J1750's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J1750 and Intel Core i3-4160 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J1750 has a base speed of 2.4 GHz, while the Intel Core i3-4160 runs at 3.6 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J1750 supports a turbo speed of GHz, compared to GHz for the Intel Core i3-4160.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J1750 has 2 cores, while the Intel Core i3-4160 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J1750 supports 2 threads, compared to 4 threads for the Intel Core i3-4160.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170, while the Intel Core i3-4160 uses the FCLGA1150.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J1750 was launched on Q2 2014, while the Intel Core i3-4160 was released on Q3 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J1750 has MB of L3 cache, compared to 3 MB for the Intel Core i3-4160.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J1750
Intel Core i3-4160
Manufacturer
Intel
Intel
Speed
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Turbo
GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCLGA1150
Launched
Q2 2014
Q3 2014
L3 Cache
MB
3 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J1750:
10%
Intel Core i3-4160:
33%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J1750
0%
Intel Core i3-4160:
5%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J1750: 10 watts
2.5%
Intel Core i3-4160: 54 watts
13.5%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J1750 : Q2 2014 ✅
Intel Core i3-4160 : Q3 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J1750
Intel Core i3-4160
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J1750 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J1750 has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Core i3-4160's 75.09. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The Intel Celeron J1750 has 2 threads, which is fewer than the Intel Core i3-4160's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J1750 scores 538, which is lower than the Intel Core i3-4160's score of 3522. This makes the Intel Core i3-4160 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Intel Core i3-4160 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Core i3-4160 was launched more recently (Q3 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J1750 (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher base clock speed of 3.6 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's 2.4 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1997, the Intel Core i3-4160 outperforms the Intel Celeron J1750 (score: 642). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Larger L3 Cache: The Intel Core i3-4160 features a larger L3 cache of 3MB compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Core i3-4160 has a higher TDP of 54W compared to the Intel Celeron J1750's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J1750
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Intel Core i3-4160
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J1750
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Intel Core i3-4160
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J1750
The Intel Celeron J1750 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
Intel Core i3-4160
The Intel Core i3-4160 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
