Comparison between Intel Celeron J3060 and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Intel Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is manufactured by AMD.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base speed of 3.7 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher turbo speed of 4.3 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J3060's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J3060 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170 socket, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2 socket.
Intel Celeron J3060 was launched in Q3 2016, while AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was launched in Q2 2014.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J3060 and AMD FX-670K Quad-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J3060 has a base speed of 1.6 GHz, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core runs at 3.7 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J3060 supports a turbo speed of 2.5 GHz, compared to 4.3 GHz for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J3060 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J3060 uses the BGA1170, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core uses the FM2.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J3060 was launched on Q3 2016, while the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core was released on Q2 2014.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J3060 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J3060
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Turbo
2.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
BGA1170
FM2
Launched
Q3 2016
Q2 2014
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J3060:
10%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
26%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J3060
0%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J3060: 6 watts
1.5%
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J3060 : Q3 2016 ✅
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core : Q2 2014 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J3060
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J3060 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3060 was launched more recently (Q3 2016) compared to the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core (Q2 2014). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J3060 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J3060 scores 678, which is lower than the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core's score of 2980. This makes the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher base clock speed of 3.7 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 1.6 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core supports a higher turbo boost speed of 4.3 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 2.5 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1578, the AMD FX-670K Quad-Core outperforms the Intel Celeron J3060 (score: 635). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3060's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3060's 6W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J3060
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J3060
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J3060
The Intel Celeron J3060 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD FX-670K Quad-Core
The AMD FX-670K Quad-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
