🚀 CPU Launch

Intel Celeron J3455E vs AMD A6-7400K APU

Table of Contents



Overview:

Comparison between Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD A6-7400K APU

Intel Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A6-7400K APU is manufactured by AMD. AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3455E's 1.5 GHz. AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher turbo speed of 3.9 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J3455E's 2.3 GHz. Intel Celeron J3455E has more cores (4) compared to AMD A6-7400K APU's 2 cores. Intel Celeron J3455E supports more threads (4) compared to AMD A6-7400K APU's threads.

Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop. Intel Celeron J3455E uses the FCBGA1296 socket, while AMD A6-7400K APU uses the FM2+ socket. Intel Celeron J3455E was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD A6-7400K APU was launched in Q4 2014. Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.

Specification Summary

The Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD A6-7400K APU are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:

  • Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
  • Speed: The Intel Celeron J3455E has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD A6-7400K APU runs at 3.5 GHz.
  • Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J3455E supports a turbo speed of 2.3 GHz, compared to 3.9 GHz for the AMD A6-7400K APU.
  • Cores: The Intel Celeron J3455E has 4 cores, while the AMD A6-7400K APU has 2 cores.
  • Threads: The Intel Celeron J3455E supports 4 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A6-7400K APU.
  • Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
  • Socket: The Intel Celeron J3455E uses the FCBGA1296, while the AMD A6-7400K APU uses the FM2+.
  • Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J3455E was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD A6-7400K APU was released on Q4 2014.
  • L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J3455E has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A6-7400K APU.

Detailed Specifications:

Specs Intel Celeron J3455E AMD A6-7400K APU
Intel AMD
Manufacturer Intel AMD
Speed 1.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo 2.3 GHz 3.9 GHz
Cores 4 2
Threads 4
Class Desktop Desktop
Socket FCBGA1296 FM2+
Launched Q3 2020 Q4 2014
L3 Cache MB MB

Review:

Single Core Performance:


CPU Performance in single-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J3455E:



14%
AMD A6-7400K APU:
24%
* More is Better

Multi Core Performance:


CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications

Intel Celeron J3455E



3%
AMD A6-7400K APU:
2%
* More is Better

Power Efficiency:


Power Consumption of CPU under full load

Intel Celeron J3455E: 10 watts



2.5%
AMD A6-7400K APU: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better

Launched Date:


Time when the CPU was launched


Intel Celeron J3455E : Q3 2020 ✅

AMD A6-7400K APU : Q4 2014 ✅

* Newer is Better

CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:

CPU Final Rating Ratings

Intel Celeron J3455E



AMD A6-7400K APU


Pro's and Con's

Intel Celeron J3455E – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Higher CPU Mark Score: The Intel Celeron J3455E has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the AMD A6-7400K APU's 19.25. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.

Cons:

  • Not available

AMD A6-7400K APU – Pros and Cons

Pros:

  • Newer Release: The AMD A6-7400K APU was launched more recently (Q4 2014) compared to the Intel Celeron J3455E (Q3 2020). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
  • Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3455E's 1.5 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
  • Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A6-7400K APU supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.9 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J3455E's 2.3 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
  • Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1442, the AMD A6-7400K APU outperforms the Intel Celeron J3455E (score: 846). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.

Cons:

  • Fewer Cores: The AMD A6-7400K APU has 2 cores, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3455E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
  • Fewer Threads: The AMD A6-7400K APU has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J3455E's 4 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
  • Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD A6-7400K APU scores 1640, which is lower than the Intel Celeron J3455E's score of 2193. This makes the Intel Celeron J3455E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
  • Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A6-7400K APU has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J3455E's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.


Productivity


Intel Celeron J3455E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

AMD A6-7400K APU
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease. It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.


Gaming

Intel Celeron J3455E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.

AMD A6-7400K APU
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.



Verdict

Intel Celeron J3455E

The Intel Celeron J3455E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.

AMD A6-7400K APU

The AMD A6-7400K APU is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.