Intel Celeron J3455E vs AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
Intel Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 is manufactured by AMD.
Intel Celeron J3455E has a higher base speed of 1.5 GHz compared to AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560's GHz.
Intel Celeron J3455E has a higher turbo speed of 2.3 GHz compared to AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (4).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (4).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J3455E uses the FCBGA1296 socket, while AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 uses the socket.
Intel Celeron J3455E was launched in Q3 2020, while AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 was launched in Q3 2015.
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 has a larger L3 cache of 6 MB compared to Intel Celeron J3455E's MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J3455E and AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J3455E has a base speed of 1.5 GHz, while the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 runs at GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J3455E supports a turbo speed of 2.3 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J3455E has 4 cores, while the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J3455E supports 4 threads, compared to 4 threads for the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J3455E uses the FCBGA1296, while the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 uses the .
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J3455E was launched on Q3 2020, while the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 was released on Q3 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J3455E has MB of L3 cache, compared to 6 MB for the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J3455E
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
1.5 GHz
GHz
Turbo
2.3 GHz
GHz
Cores
4
4
Threads
4
4
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1296
Launched
Q3 2020
Q3 2015
L3 Cache
MB
6 MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J3455E:
14%
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560:
4%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J3455E
3%
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J3455E: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560: watts
0%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J3455E : Q3 2020 ✅
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 : Q3 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J3455E
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J3455E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J3455E was launched more recently (Q3 2020) compared to the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 (Q3 2015). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The Intel Celeron J3455E has a higher base clock speed of 1.5 GHz compared to the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560's GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J3455E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.3 GHz compared to the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 846, the Intel Celeron J3455E outperforms the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 (score: 282). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Higher Power Consumption: The Intel Celeron J3455E has a higher TDP of 10W compared to the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560's W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Larger L3 Cache: The AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 features a larger L3 cache of 6MB compared to the Intel Celeron J3455E's MB. A larger cache improves performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as video editing or 3D rendering, by reducing latency and speeding up data access.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 scores 1063, which is lower than the Intel Celeron J3455E's score of 2193. This makes the Intel Celeron J3455E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J3455E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J3455E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J3455E
The Intel Celeron J3455E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560
The AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-6560 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
