Comparison between Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD A10-9700E
Intel Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD.
AMD A10-9700E has a higher base speed of 3.0 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz.
AMD A10-9700E has a higher turbo speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.7 GHz.
AMD A10-9700E has more cores (4) compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2 cores.
Intel Celeron J4005 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD A10-9700E's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron J4005 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD A10-9700E was launched in Q4 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD A10-9700E are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4005 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD A10-9700E runs at 3.0 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports a turbo speed of 2.7 GHz, compared to 3.5 GHz for the AMD A10-9700E.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores, while the AMD A10-9700E has 4 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD A10-9700E.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD A10-9700E uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4005 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD A10-9700E was released on Q4 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4005 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD A10-9700E.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD A10-9700E
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.0 GHz
Turbo
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Cores
2
4
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
Launched
Q1 2018
Q4 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005:
17%
AMD A10-9700E:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005
2%
AMD A10-9700E:
4%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4005: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD A10-9700E: 35 watts
8.75%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4005 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD A10-9700E : Q4 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD A10-9700E
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4005 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Not available
Cons:
Fewer Cores: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores, which is fewer than the AMD A10-9700E's 4 cores. This could impact performance in multi-threaded workloads, such as rendering, compiling code, or running virtual machines.
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4005 scores 1512, which is lower than the AMD A10-9700E's score of 3242. This makes the AMD A10-9700E a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD A10-9700E – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD A10-9700E was launched more recently (Q4 2017) compared to the Intel Celeron J4005 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD A10-9700E has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD A10-9700E supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.7 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1505, the AMD A10-9700E outperforms the Intel Celeron J4005 (score: 1071). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD A10-9700E has a higher CPU Mark score of 36.39 compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 8.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD A10-9700E has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4005's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD A10-9700E has a higher TDP of 35W compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4005
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD A10-9700E
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4005
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD A10-9700E
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4005
The Intel Celeron J4005 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD A10-9700E
The AMD A10-9700E is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
