Comparison between Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD PRO A6-9500
Intel Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD PRO A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD.
AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher base speed of 3.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz.
AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher turbo speed of 3.8 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.7 GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Intel Celeron J4005 supports more threads (2) compared to AMD PRO A6-9500's threads.
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD PRO A6-9500 uses the AM4 socket.
Intel Celeron J4005 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD PRO A6-9500 was launched in Q1 2017.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD PRO A6-9500 are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4005 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 runs at 3.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports a turbo speed of 2.7 GHz, compared to 3.8 GHz for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports 2 threads, compared to threads for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 uses the AM4.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4005 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD PRO A6-9500 was released on Q1 2017.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4005 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD PRO A6-9500.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD PRO A6-9500
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
3.5 GHz
Turbo
2.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM4
Launched
Q1 2018
Q1 2017
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005:
17%
AMD PRO A6-9500:
25%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005
2%
AMD PRO A6-9500:
2%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4005: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD PRO A6-9500: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4005 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD PRO A6-9500 : Q1 2017 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD PRO A6-9500
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4005 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The Intel Celeron J4005 was launched more recently (Q1 2018) compared to the AMD PRO A6-9500 (Q1 2017). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the Intel Celeron J4005 scores 1512, which is lower than the AMD PRO A6-9500's score of 1784. This makes the AMD PRO A6-9500 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
AMD PRO A6-9500 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher base clock speed of 3.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The AMD PRO A6-9500 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 3.8 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.7 GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1520, the AMD PRO A6-9500 outperforms the Intel Celeron J4005 (score: 1071). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher CPU Mark score of 24.11 compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 8.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Fewer Threads: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has threads, which is fewer than the Intel Celeron J4005's 2 threads. This may limit its ability to handle highly parallel workloads efficiently.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD PRO A6-9500 has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4005
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD PRO A6-9500
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4005
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD PRO A6-9500
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4005
The Intel Celeron J4005 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD PRO A6-9500
The AMD PRO A6-9500 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
