Intel Celeron J4005 vs AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Table of Contents
Overview:
Comparison between Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Intel Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core is manufactured by AMD.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher base speed of 2.5 GHz compared to Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz.
Intel Celeron J4005 has a higher turbo speed of 2.7 GHz compared to AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's GHz.
Both CPUs have the same number of cores (2).
Both CPUs support the same number of threads (2).
Both CPUs belong to the same class: Desktop.
Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090 socket, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core uses the FM1 socket.
Intel Celeron J4005 was launched in Q1 2018, while AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core was launched in Q2 2015.
Both CPUs have the same L3 cache size of MB.
Specification Summary
The Intel Celeron J4005 and AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core are two processors with distinct specifications. Below is a detailed comparison of their key features:
Manufacturer: Both processors are manufactured by Intel.
Speed: The Intel Celeron J4005 has a base speed of 2.0 GHz, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core runs at 2.5 GHz.
Turbo Boost: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports a turbo speed of 2.7 GHz, compared to GHz for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Cores: The Intel Celeron J4005 has 2 cores, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has 2 cores.
Threads: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports 2 threads, compared to 2 threads for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Class: Both processors are designed for Desktop use.
Socket: The Intel Celeron J4005 uses the FCBGA1090, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core uses the FM1.
Launch Date: The Intel Celeron J4005 was launched on Q1 2018, while the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core was released on Q2 2015.
L3 Cache: The Intel Celeron J4005 has MB of L3 cache, compared to MB for the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core.
Detailed Specifications:
Specs
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Manufacturer
Intel
AMD
Speed
2.0 GHz
2.5 GHz
Turbo
2.7 GHz
GHz
Cores
2
2
Threads
2
2
Class
Desktop
Desktop
Socket
FCBGA1090
FM1
Launched
Q1 2018
Q2 2015
L3 Cache
MB
MB
Review:
Single Core Performance:
CPU Performance in single-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005:
17%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core:
17%
* More is Better
Multi Core Performance:
CPU Performance in multi-threaded applications
Intel Celeron J4005
2%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core:
1%
* More is Better
Power Efficiency:
Power Consumption of CPU under full load
Intel Celeron J4005: 10 watts
2.5%
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core: 65 watts
16.25%
* Lower is Better
Launched Date:
Time when the CPU was launched
Intel Celeron J4005 : Q1 2018 ✅
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core : Q2 2015 ✅
* Newer is Better
CPU Launch FINAL SCORE:
CPU Final Rating Ratings
Intel Celeron J4005
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Pro's and Con's
Intel Celeron J4005 – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Higher Turbo Boost Speed: The Intel Celeron J4005 supports a higher turbo boost speed of 2.7 GHz compared to the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core's GHz. This allows for better performance during peak workloads.
Faster Single-Core Performance: With a single-threaded performance score of 1071, the Intel Celeron J4005 outperforms the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core (score: 1070). This makes it better suited for tasks that rely on single-core performance, such as gaming or everyday productivity.
Cons:
Not available
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core – Pros and Cons
Pros:
Newer Release: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core was launched more recently (Q2 2015) compared to the Intel Celeron J4005 (Q1 2018). This means it benefits from the latest advancements in technology, improved efficiency, and potentially better software optimization.
Higher Base Clock Speed: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher base clock speed of 2.5 GHz compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 2.0 GHz. This results in better performance for single-threaded tasks and general responsiveness.
Higher CPU Mark Score: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher CPU Mark score of NA compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 8.96. This indicates better overall performance across a wide range of tasks.
Cons:
Lower Multi-Core Performance: In multi-threaded tasks, the AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core scores 930, which is lower than the Intel Celeron J4005's score of 1512. This makes the Intel Celeron J4005 a better choice for heavy multitasking or parallel processing.
Higher Power Consumption: The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core has a higher TDP of 65W compared to the Intel Celeron J4005's 10W. This means it may consume more power, leading to higher energy costs and potentially more heat generation, which could require better cooling solutions.
Productivity
Intel Celeron J4005
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
This cpu Handles Entry Level level office applications, web browsing, and media playback with ease.
It can also be used for Entry Level level multitasking or CPU-intensive tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Gaming
Intel Celeron J4005
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
Ideal for Entry Level level gaming (when paired with a dedicated GPU) and Entry Level level computing.
Verdict
Intel Celeron J4005
The Intel Celeron J4005 is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core
The AMD Sempron X2 198 Dual-Core is a reliable and Entry Level processor for your PC builds. It delivers excellent value for users with Entry Level computing needs or those building a New PC.
